Skip to content
Explore expert articles on business strategies, innovation …

Might Other Countries Follow Australia's Lead in Restricting Social Platforms for Youth Under Sixteen?

The nation's controversial action to ban social platforms access for those under 16 is creating waves worldwide. Officials, child protection groups, and parents are observing with great interest to see if this tactic will inspire imitation for the rest of the world.

The European Trend

Throughout Europe, a rising number of countries are exploring similar measures.

  • Denmark has stated a ban on social media for children under fifteen, with the leader declaring that smartphones and networks are "stealing our kids' youth". Legislation could be enacted soon.
  • Norway is set to enforce a minimum age limit of 15, highlighting the need to protect the young from the "influence of the algorithms".
  • Ireland is working on a online verification tool to authenticate the age and identity of social media users. Officials have indicated that an Australia-style ban could be "an measures on the table".
  • In The Spanish government, the leader has urged lawmakers to approve a proposal lifting the access age for accessing social media to 16.
  • In France, the leader has threatened a ban for under-15s, and a government panel has endorsed a similar step, alongside an overnight "screen time restriction" for adolescents.
  • The government in The Netherlands has advised guardians to prevent their children from social media until 15.

Across the European Union, the European parliament has approved a advisory statement supporting a ban for teenagers under 16 unless guardian approval is provided. Although it warns of the "compulsive" nature of these apps, the resolution does not enact mandatory rules.

"A strong age limit is a good foundation," commented the European lawmaker supporting the resolution.

Britain: A Cautious Approach

For the United Kingdom, the administration has kept open a future ban, arguing that "nothing is being dismissed" but maintaining any decision must be "grounded in robust data".

Earlier, support grew behind a legislative effort to enact restrictions on social media use by under-16s, but it was ultimately modified. However, the government pledged to investigate the matter.

Charities have raised concerns. An organization established by the relatives of a young person who died after being exposed to harmful social media material argues that a blanket age ban may not protect children and could result in a "dangerous transition" of harm when teens become eligible.

"Australia's ban is a reaction to the refusal of the social media companies to create products and services that are safe and age appropriate for children," commented a influential peer.

America: A Decentralized Approach

Across America, action is mostly happening at the regional level amid federal inaction.

  • Utah requires parental consent for minors to use social media and restricts late-night use.
  • Florida has passed a bill prohibiting those below 14 from accessing social media, though it is entangled in court battles.
  • Virginia has enacted a rule limiting teenagers to 60 minutes of social media time per day, with extra time dependent on adult consent.
  • Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly introduced measures mandating adult authorization for teenagers to create social media accounts.

Despite cross-party agreement and suggestions from some individuals to mimic the Australian lead, a nationwide ban is right now seen as unlikely.

Worldwide Outlook

Beyond Europe and the US, other countries are similarly taking action.

  • Malaysia plans to restrict social media for teenagers effective next year.
  • Brazil has increased the required age for one major platform to 16.

But, international organizations adopt a more cautious position. A major UN agency has cautioned that social media bans carry risks and "could have unintended consequences". The organization highlights that the internet can be a "vital connection" for vulnerable youth and that bans should not be a "substitute" for platform operators to prioritize user protection.

While this worldwide discussion evolves, the steps of the Australian government and several other countries demonstrate that states globally are increasingly willing to stand by for platforms to make changes on their own.

Written by

Samuel Torres

A business strategist with over a decade of experience in helping startups scale globally through innovative approaches.

FlowPulse Global

Type to search articles.